Postgresql Error Could Not Read Block 0 In File
What do your base stats do for your character other than set your modifiers? Suddenly our webapplication cant connect to the PostgreSQL Server. The old DB still works when I rename it back, so I wonder ... does this even make sense?) - somehow disallow to setup of streaming replication when there is a hash index in any DB / and refuse the creation of a hash index http://spamdestructor.com/could-not/postgresql-error-could-not-read-block-in-file.php
That would get people's attention without being mere nagging in other situations. Why do units (from physics) behave like numbers? It's not a 100% solution because you'd still lose if you tried to use a hash index on a slave since promoted to master. I feel we are waiting for the calvary to come over the hill (and fix hash indexes), except the calvary never arrives. http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/44508/error-could-not-read-block-x-of-relation-base-y-z
Could Not Read Block In File Postgresql
Collaborator lonvia commented Jun 12, 2012 Glad it worked. People will then wish they'd listened at the first stage." Responses Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... And indexes and tables can be of any type, there are no regularity. We need a check that is tightly > connected to actual unsafe usage, rather than basically-user-unfriendly > complaints at a point that's not doing anything unsafe. (Well, anything > more unsafe
I feel we are waiting for the calvary to come over the hill (and fix hash indexes), except the calvary never arrives. At some point we have to take ownership of No other strange errors found in the logs since server was put to production half year ago. One of the arguments against Bruce's proposal to print a warning at hash index creation is that it's a particularly ineffective form of deprecation. Postgresql Invalid Page In Block In messages like "could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes" YYYYY is my database and ZZZZZ somehow relates to a table or to an
If someone today tried to add a crash-unsafe, replication-impotent index, it would never be accepted, but because hash indexes came from Berkeley, we go with a warning in the CREATE INDEX Postgresql Error Could Not Read Block In File Why can't I set NODE_ENV to undefined? If you want to create hash indexes you need to set it to > > true or else you just get errors. > > I still think this is throwing the https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwaQQBG-gOmFB8XEebY1jpadu0Y-m7i9wJQFaQbGpy-%[email protected] I increased PGs shared memory a bit, now it seems to import fine.
If someone knows they are using a hash index intentionally then the notice/warning will be understood and ignored while if someone is seeing the notice/warning and are not aware of the Postgres Zero_damaged_pages I wonder though if we could throw a flat-out error for attempts to use a hash index on a hot standby server. Carrying Metal gifts to USA (elephant, eagle & peacock) for my friends Is it illegal to DDoS a phishing page? At some point we have to take ownership of the situation we are in and actively do something.
Postgresql Error Could Not Read Block In File
We get the PSQLException: Broken Pipe. check over here What I see in file system: hh=# SELECT relfilenode from pg_class where relname='agency_statistics_old'; relfilenode ------------- 118881486 postgres(at)db10:~/tmp$ ls -la /var/lib/postgresql/9.0/main/base/16404/118881486 -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 0 2012-02-20 12:04 /var/lib/postgresql/9.0/main/base/16404/118881486 So table file Could Not Read Block In File Postgresql Reload to refresh your session. Postgres Could Not Read Block If you want to create hash indexes you need to set it to > > true or else you just get errors. > > I still think this is throwing the
If WAL-logging of hash indexes is ever implemented, we can remove >> this warning. > > Applied, though I used the term "streaming standbys" to match our docs. navigate here EDIT: I tried this code: select relname , relfilenode from pg_class where relname in ('1663','16384','16564'); but it returns: relname | relfilenode ---------+------------- (0 rows) postgresql share|improve this question edited Aug 1 If you want to create hash indexes you need to set it to > true or else you just get errors. But it would help without being a large sink for effort. Invalid Page In Block Of Relation Base
And when shared buffers were set to 8Gb I hadn't experienced such troubles. So I have files to dig into. In the past, I have suggested we issue a warning for the creation of hash indexes, but did not get enough agreement. -- Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> Check This Out Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc.
Hmm. Postgresql Reindex Table Why does a full moon seem uniformly bright from earth, shouldn't it be dimmer at the "border"? It's not a 100% solution > because you'd still lose if you tried to use a hash index on a slave > since promoted to master.
I'm all for additional and improved warnings in other places but this one at least seems to have the benefit of being relatively simple to implement and non-obnoxious since it only
Did you reproduce the issue from > a corrupted database as well before? > > Greetings, > > Andres > > > Regards, > > Mayank MittalBarco Electronics System Ltd.Mob. +91 In response to Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes at 2014-05-16 14:48:25 from Bruce Momjian Responses Re: Re: BUG Here are vmstat logs (vmstat 10 > vmstat.log): procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 Postgresql Repair and maybe one day PostgreSQL will be clever enough to issue a warning / error in such a case for the people like me who don't read *all the doc* :P
I will appreciate any help, thank you in advance. The cache entry for that index isn't cleaned up when the index creation fails? (Possibly relevant: if you don't create the (id) index first, the error does not occur; effect of If WAL-logging of hash indexes is ever implemented, we can remove this warning. -- Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB this contact form How to do \widthof with a symbol Human vs apes: What advantages do humans have over apes?
Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up ERROR: could not read block 4707 of relation 1663/16384/16564: Success up vote 6 down vote favorite 1 I am using psql 8.1.18 That is, if the database crashes and there were no writes in progress or the machine crashes and there were no writes since the last checkpoint then the index should still Phone RU: +7 910 405 4718 Phone AU: +61 45 218 5678 Skype: maxim.boguk Jabber: maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com LinkedIn profile: http://nz.linkedin.com/in/maximboguk "If they can send one man to the moon... Any suggestions where and what I should look next?
If people cannot solve the problem, try technology. I have PostgreSQL 9.0.4 installation using streaming replication, 1 master and 10 replicas. That should be doable. x x) has a type, then is the type system inconsistent?
Where's the 0xBEEF? I still think this is throwing the error at the wrong place. In the > past, I have suggested we issue a warning for the creation of hash > indexes, but did not get enough agreement. In your example, since the hash index was created by some app not manually, I'll bet nobody would have seen/noticed the warning even if there had been one.